Another A320 crash


Germanwings crash (Image source: AFP)

The Germanwings A320 crash

At this stage there’s not more that can be said about the particulars of this tragedy that has claimed a 150 lives in a mountainous corner of France. Disturbingly again we have an A320 aircraft descending rapidly and apparently out of control, without the crew having any time to issue a distress call. Yet more disturbing is the though that the crash might be due to the crew failing to carry out the workaround for two blocked AoA probes promulgated in this Emergency Airworthiness Directive (EAD) that was issued in December of last year. And, as the final and rather unpleasant icing on this particular cake, there is the followup question as to whether the problem covered by the directive might also have been a causal factor in the AirAsia flight 8501 crash. That, if it be the case, would be very, very nasty indeed.

Unfortunately at this stage the answer to all of the above questions is that no one knows the answer, especially as the Indonesian investigators have declined to issue any further information on the causes of the Air Asia crash. However what we can be sure of is that given the highly dependable nature of aircraft systems the answer when it comes will comprise an apparently unlikely combinations of events, actions and circumstance, because that is the nature of accidents that occur in high dependability systems. One thing that’s also for sure, there’ll be little sleep in Toulouse until the FDRs are recovered, and maybe not much after that….


if having read the EAD your’e left wondering why it directed that two ADR’s be turned off it’s simply that by doing so you push the aircraft out of what’s called Normal law, where Alpha protection is trying to drive the nose down, into Alternate law, where the (erroneous) Alpha protection is removed. Of course in order to do so you need to be able to recognise, diagnose and apply the correct action, which also generally requires training.

4 responses to Another A320 crash


    Do you really think this might have happened due to icing of the probes? It happened at cruise altitude and in contrast to the Air Asia and the Air France flight a few years ago the weather seems to have been completely clear. Also given the time it took to descent I really would have expected them to be able to send out at least a short distress call.

    Deeply troubling indeed, hopefully they can recover enough information to reconstruct the cause this time.


      Matthew Squair 25/03/2015 at 9:01 pm

      This may not be icing but rather angle of attack vanes frozen at a lower airspeed, as also occurred in Perpignon… And it’s purely conjecture at the moment as to what really happened to AirAsia (icing, blocked AoA vanes?). I’m not really surprised by the lack of a mayday, the crew are trained to fly, navigate and communicate in that order so no mayday is not that unusual.



    I think your comment:

    “…the answer when it comes will likely comprise an apparently unlikely combinations of events, actions and circumstance, because that is the nature of accidents that occur in high dependability systems.”

    is the most important part of your post. Speculation in the press has included many scenarios, but the actual flight data will probably tell the answer. Better to analyse that first before producing some early conclusions that will just have to be “unlearned” after we learn what really happened.